Skip to main content

Danish Arms and Palestine

Jurisdiction

Denmark

Locale

Armed Conflict in Palestine

Recipient State

Israel

Status

Ongoing

Legal proceedings in Denmark, in the context of the situation in Palestine, are seeking to halt the transfer of arms under the F-35 fighter jet programme, including parts and components, to Israel on the grounds of their potential use in the commission of war crimes and contribution to what plausibly amounts to genocide. The application states that direct or indirect transfers of Danish weapons components and other military equipment to Israel are in violation of the ATT and the EU Common Position, which “clearly state that member states are obligated to deny arms exports if there is a clear risk that the weapons or weapons components are used to violate international law”.

 The case was registered with the court in Denmark on 3 April 2024. The hearings took place on 25-28 February 2025. On 11 April 2025, the Danish High Court dismissed the case, finding that the claimants did not have the required legal interest (retlig interesse)*. As a result, the claim regarding a suspensory effect (so that arms exports to Israel cannot take place while the case is pending) was not assessed. The claimants have appealed the decision, and the case is scheduled to be heard in the Supreme Court in March 2026.

*The Danish legal concept of ‘retlig interesse’ encompasses aspects of legal standing and legal interest that requires organisations and individuals who seek to challenge Government decisions to show that they are directly, individually, and considerably affected by the decision in question, in order for the case to proceed to the main hearing stage. This means showing the type of organisation that Oxfam Denmark is and how its work has been affected in Gaza.  

Case Analysis

The lawsuit filed by Amnesty International Denmark, Oxfam Denmark, ActionAid Denmark (Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke), and Al-Haq against the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Danish National Police focuses on Denmark's alleged violation of its international arms export obligations.

The organisations asserted that Danish military equipment, particularly parts for F-35 fighter jets, may be contributing to potential war crimes in Gaza. They sought to halt arms exports to Israel to protect civilians and prevent Denmark from contributing to violations of international law. The case challenged Denmark’s commitment to human rights and international peacekeeping efforts, highlighting the contradiction between its export practices and its current role as a member of the UN Security Council, where adherence to international and humanitarian law is presented as a guiding principle.  

In addition, the organisations made a suspensory appeal arguing that the court must make a decision as quickly as possible due to the fact that Danish weapons and weapon components are likely used to violate international law in the ongoing war in Gaza. The organisations have asked for the case to be tried at the appellate court rather than in the first instance court to ensure that the process is as efficient as possible.  

Hearings were held in February 2025. On 11 April 2025, however, the Danish Eastern High Court dismissed the case, ruling that the organisations did not have the necessary legal standing. As a result, the question of suspensory effect was not examined. The claimants have since appealed the decision to the Danish Supreme Court.

The Danish Weapons Act prohibits the export of weapons or arms equipment without a licence from the Ministry of Justice. Authority for granting export licences has been delegated to the Danish National Police since 2018. The case challenged adherence to EU rules on arms exports, including the Common Position, which provides legally binding criteria for assessing export licences, particularly with respect to human rights and international humanitarian law. This includes denying an export if there is a clear risk that it might be used: for internal repression; in the commission of or to facilitate serious violations of international humanitarian law; aggression against another country or assertion by force a territorial claim. Denmark’s obligations under the Arms Trade Treaty require an assessment of the risks that the items to be exported could be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian or human rights law. Export authorisation must be denied if there is an overriding risk of such adverse effects.   

Finally, the case addresses the risk of potential violations of international humanitarian law and the Genocide Convention, which imposes obligations on states and other actors to prevent genocide and to ensure respect for international law, including by ensuring that military technology or equipment exported does not contribute to serious violations of international humanitarian law.  

The case was filed by Amnesty International Denmark, Oxfam Denmark, MS ActionAid Denmark (Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke), and the Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq.

To get in touch with the claimants and their legal representatives, please see here.

Themes

i

The Eastern High Court ruled on 11 April 2025 that the claimants lacked a sufficient legal interest (standing) to pursue the case, and dismissed the proceedings on that basis. The claimants have announced that they will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.

Read more about standing across all cases

Matter not arisen in proceedings, as the case was dismissed on procedural grounds (standing) before substantive issues were examined.

Read more about the issue of transparency in other jurisdictions

Matter not arisen in proceedings.

Read more about the issue of justiciability in other jurisdictions

Cases

Case status

Ongoing

Lawsuit against the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Police in Denmark

Explore case

On 3 April 2024, Amnesty International Denmark, Oxfam Denmark, ActionAid Denmark (Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke), and the Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the National Police of Denmark. The claimants asked that any existing permits for the export of military equipment to Israel be revoked, including permits for the permanent export of parts and components of F-35 fighter jets. The claimants argued that any...

Key Case Documents

View all case documents

Timeline

FILTERS

Mar 2026

Challenge 1

Hearing scheduled in the Supreme Court.

11 Apr 2025

Challenge 1

High Court dismissed the case for lack of standing.

Apr 2025

Challenge 1

Claimants announced they will appeal to the Supreme Court.

Aug 2024

Challenge 1

Respondents sought dismissal, challenging the claimants’ legal interest (standing).

03 Apr 2024

Challenge 1

Case filed in Copenhagen City Court.

Analysis

20 January 2025

Denmark proposes arms law change for Israel

Ritzau News

News coverage on the Danish government’s proposal to amend national arms legislation to permit continued transfers of F-35 spare parts to Israel, amid legal concerns linked to international humanitarian law risk and ongoing litigation developments.

25 October 2024

Arms exports and access to justice: Enforcing international law through domestic courts

Jacques Hartmann, Lea Köhne and Vincent Widdig | EJIL: Talk!

This article examines recent domestic litigation in Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Denmark challenging arms export decisions, highlighting key legal and procedural barriers such as standing, justiciability and deference to executive authorities.

Contact & More Information

If you would like to know more about this case, please get in touch with our primary contact Jonas Devantier (Oxfam Denmark) by email

Find out more about the work of the Plaintiffs at their websites: 

Amnesty International Denmark

Oxfam Denmark

MS ActionAid Denmark

Al-Haq