Home > Case Overviews > Danish Arms and Palestine
Danish Arms and Palestine
Jurisdiction
Denmark
Locale
Armed Conflict in Palestine
Recipient State
Israel
Status
Ongoing
Legal proceedings in Denmark, in the context of the situation in Palestine, are seeking to halt the transfer of arms under the F-35 fighter jet programme, including parts and components, to Israel on the grounds of their potential use in the commission of war crimes and contribution to what plausibly amounts to genocide. The application states that direct or indirect transfers of Danish weapons components and other military equipment to Israel are in violation of the ATT and the EU Common Position, which “clearly state that member states are obligated to deny arms exports if there is a clear risk that the weapons or weapons components are used to violate international law”.
The case was registered with the court in Denmark on 3 April 2024. The hearings took place on 25-28 February 2025. On 11 April 2025, the Danish High Court dismissed the case, finding that the claimants did not have the required legal interest (retlig interesse)*. As a result, the claim regarding a suspensory effect (so that arms exports to Israel cannot take place while the case is pending) was not assessed. The claimants have appealed the decision, and the case is scheduled to be heard in the Supreme Court in March 2026.
*The Danish legal concept of ‘retlig interesse’ encompasses aspects of legal standing and legal interest that requires organisations and individuals who seek to challenge Government decisions to show that they are directly, individually, and considerably affected by the decision in question, in order for the case to proceed to the main hearing stage. This means showing the type of organisation that Oxfam Denmark is and how its work has been affected in Gaza.
Latest developments
Case Analysis
The lawsuit filed by Amnesty International Denmark, Oxfam Denmark, ActionAid Denmark (Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke), and Al-Haq against the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Danish National Police focuses on Denmark's alleged violation of its international arms export obligations.
Themes
iCases
Case status
Lawsuit against the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Police in Denmark
Explore caseOn 3 April 2024, Amnesty International Denmark, Oxfam Denmark, ActionAid Denmark (Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke), and the Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq filed a lawsuit against the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark and the National Police of Denmark. The claimants asked that any existing permits for the export of military equipment to Israel be revoked, including permits for the permanent export of parts and components of F-35 fighter jets. The claimants argued that any...
Key Case Documents
View all case documentsTimeline
FILTERS
Mar 2026
Hearing scheduled in the Supreme Court.
11 Apr 2025
High Court dismissed the case for lack of standing.
Apr 2025
Claimants announced they will appeal to the Supreme Court.
Aug 2024
Respondents sought dismissal, challenging the claimants’ legal interest (standing).
03 Apr 2024
Case filed in Copenhagen City Court.
Contact & More Information
If you would like to know more about this case, please get in touch with our primary contact Jonas Devantier (Oxfam Denmark) by email.
Find out more about the work of the Plaintiffs at their websites:
Key
There has been a recent improvement in this thematic area
There has been a recent worsening of this thematic area
Analysis
20 January 2025
Denmark proposes arms law change for IsraelRitzau News
News coverage on the Danish government’s proposal to amend national arms legislation to permit continued transfers of F-35 spare parts to Israel, amid legal concerns linked to international humanitarian law risk and ongoing litigation developments.
Read more25 October 2024
Arms exports and access to justice: Enforcing international law through domestic courtsJacques Hartmann, Lea Köhne and Vincent Widdig | EJIL: Talk!
This article examines recent domestic litigation in Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Denmark challenging arms export decisions, highlighting key legal and procedural barriers such as standing, justiciability and deference to executive authorities.
Read more