Skip to main content

South African Arms and Yemen

Jurisdiction

South Africa

Locale

Armed Conflict in Yemen

Recipient State

Saudi Arabia

Status

Ongoing

In June 2021, two NGOs jointly initiated administrative proceedings in South African courts that seek to challenge licences issued for the export of arms and military goods to countries involved in the Yemen conflict. This claim calls for the review of export licences granted to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) due to their poor human rights record and the strong body of evidence indicating their involvement in the commission of international humanitarian law

and international human rights law violations in the armed conflict in Yemen.

This case is still pending before administrative courts.

Latest developments

Case Analysis

Proceedings in South Africa have taken a broader approach and sought to challenge a series of unspecified licences granted by the competent licensing authority for arms exports to Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Reporting on licences in South Africa is often severely delayed and very limited information is provided even when licences are reported on. This has restricted the ability for concerned parties to administratively challenge specific licences until long after they have been issued, and has also prevented cases being brought against specific arms manufacturers as licence recipients as their details are not provided in any public reporting.

This ongoing claim therefore provides a strong opportunity to challenge the practice of South African authorities to regularly issue licences for the export of arms to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, specifically as the claimants have invoked evidence pertaining to the existence of these arms in Yemen.

Arms export controls in South Africa are regulated at the national level by the National Conventional Arms Control (NCAC) Act. This vests the competence to make licencing decisions for the export of arms with the National Conventional Arms Control Committee (NCACC), whose members are appointed by the President and are supported by a secretariat known as the Directorate of Conventional Arms Control (DCAC) that forms part of the Ministry of Defence.

According to domestic legislation, licensing decisions must consider whether the recipient government systematically violates or unlawfully suppresses IHRL guarantees and whether the transfer is likely to endanger peace or contribute to the escalation of conflict or regional instability. If any of these criteria are met, then the NCACC must ‘avoid’ arms exports to these destinations. The licensing authority must also take into account South Africa’s international obligations and commitments including under the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) to which it is a State Party. NCAC Act, Section 15

Litigation in South Africa has sought to challenge the licensing decisions of the NCACC in judicial review proceedings pursuant to the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, Section 6.

For a visual overview of the South African framework, see this infographic by Open Secrets.

A claim has been jointly brought by two South African organisations – the Southern Africa Litigation Centre (SALC) and Open Secrets.

To get in touch with the claimants, please see here.

Themes

i

Reporting on licences is often severely delayed and reports that are published do not provide comprehensive information on key features including the details of licence recipients. This has barred the initiation of challenges against licences until long after they are issued.

Read more about the issue of transparency in other jurisdictions

The licensing authority must take into account South Africa’s international obligations and commitments including under the ATT, to which it is a State Party. This is the subject of the ongoing challenge.

Read more about the applicability of international and legal instruments across the challenges

Matter has not yet been considered in proceedings.

Read more about standing across all cases

Matter has not yet been considered in proceedings.

Read more about the issue of justiciability in other jurisdictions

Matter has not yet been considered in proceedings.

Read more about whether claimants have been granted remedy in other jurisdictions

Cases

A case initiated in the South African courts is still pending before administrative courts. Click ‘explore case’ to find out about the case in more detail and access all case documents.

Case status

Ongoing

Urgent Application for Judicial Review against the NCACC and Minister of Defence

Explore case

This case sought to judicially review licensing decisions for the export of conventional arms to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, arguing that the NCACC has failed to seriously consider the large body of evidence indicating the commission of serious IHL and IHRL violations by their forces in Yemen. This case is still under consideration, and has recently been referred for case management in an effort to expedite the case.

Key Case Documents

View all case documents

03.06.2021

Notice of Motion in the Complaint against the Chairperson of the NCACC and the Minister of Defence

Read in full

24.03.2021

Request to NCACC for Information on Permit Holders for Exports to Saudi Arabia and the UAE

Read in full

28.07.2020

Questions Submitted to the NCACC

Read in full

Timeline

FILTERS

27 Jan 2022

Challenge 1

Directive issued to the NCACC. The judge again calls for the NCACC to comply with the court order and hand over the full record.

03 Aug 2021

Challenge 1

Court orders the NCACC to hand over the full record to the Registrar.

15 Jun 2021

Challenge 1

Judgement issued on Part A. Alternative remedy accepted.

03 Jun 2021

Challenge 1

Case enters the courts. Claim submitted to the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria seeking disclosure of entities granted the contested export licences (Part A), and the judicial review of licensing decisions (Part B).

Read the claimant's submission here

Analysis

07 June 2021

Back to Old Habits? South African Arms Exports to Saudi Arabia and the UAE

Atilla Kisla (SALC) | Mail & Guardian

This article provides an overview of the major issues at stake in the case launched against the South African government. It briefly addresses the domestic legal framework, the administrative nature of export permits, and the broader context and implications of the case.

03 June 2021

Open Secrets and SALC Ask the Courts to Review Decisions to Export Arms to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates

South African Litigation Centre and Open Secrets

This fact sheet infographic provides a clear overview of the claim made by Open Secrets and SALC in the North Gauteng High Court. It considers the basis of the request, the grounds of review, the contextual crisis in Yemen and the export of South African arms to this destination.

16 April 2021

South Africa is Putting Profit Before Yemeni Lives

Zen Mathe and Michael Marchant (Open Secrets) | Al Jazeera

This article South Africa’s complicity in war crimes in Yemen as a result of illegal arms transfers to countries involved in the conflict.

Contact & More Information

If you would like to know more about this case, please get in touch with our primary contacts Michael Marchant (Open Secrets) by email here and Dr. Atilla Kisla (Southern Africa Litigation Centre) by email here.

Find out more about the work of the claimants at their website:

Open Secrets

Southern Africa Litigation Centre