Skip to main content

Canadian Arms and Palestine

Jurisdiction

Canada

Locale

Armed Conflict in Palestine

Recipient State

Israel

Status

Ongoing

Litigation in Canada, in the context of the situation in Israel and Palestine, has sought to challenge the issuance of export and brokering permits for military goods and technology to Israel as authorised by the Minister of Foreign Affairs on or after 9 October 2023 through an application for a judicial review.  

The application states that any export or brokering of military goods or technology to Israel that took place on or after 9 October 2023 is in breach of the Export and Import Permits Act (EIPA). The issuance of such permits is “unlawful because of the substantial risk (emphasis in application) that military goods or technology will be used to facilitate violations of international humanitarian law (IHL) or international human rights law (IHRL), and/or serious acts of violence against women and children, and/or undermine peace and security”. The application also states that Canada’s approval of these transfers to Israel violates public international law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 

As of April 2024, the next steps for this case remain unclear. Updates will be made available as the case proceeds.    

Case Analysis

This is the first legal proceeding addressing the EIPA and its provision concerning the export of military goods and technology.

The case seeks to ensure that Canada complies with its domestic and international legal obligations by ceasing to approve the transfer of military goods and technology ending up in Israel (including through past permits issued or still in effect on or after 9 October 2023). The case will shed light on Canada’s prosperous arms trade and the weakness of the protection measures that it purports to follow. It also sheds light on Canada’s contributions to Israel’s starvation and mass bombardment of Gaza, including the killing of tens of thousands of civilians. Another notable aspect of the case is that it argues Canada’s actions violate the constitution, namely Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Finally, the application addresses military goods that are “ultimately destined for Israel”, which could include those that go to the United States first.

Arms export controls in Canada are regulated at the national level under the Export and Import Permits Act (EIPA). Guidance on the Minister of Foreign Affairs’ decision-making process is contained in the Export and Brokering Controls Handbook. In 2018, the EIPA was amended to bring Canada into compliance with the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), although many believe Canada is largely still not in compliance with the ATT. The competence to grant licences for the export of military goods is vested in the Minister of Foreign Affairs. 

Relevant sections as set out in the application:  

Section 7.3(1) – the Minister of Foreign Affairs is required to review all export and brokering permits to determine whether goods or technology specified in the application for the permit:

a. would contribute to peace and security or undermine it; and

b. could be used to commit or facilitate:

i. a serious violation of international humanitarian law,

ii. a serious violation of international human rights law,

iii. an act constituting an offence under international conventions or protocols relating to terrorism to which Canada is a party,

iv. an act constituting an offence under international conventions or protocols relating to transnational organized crime to which Canada is a party, or

v. serious acts of gender-based violence or serious acts of violence against women and children.

Section 7.4 – The Minister shall not issue a permit in respect of arms, ammunition, implements or munitions of war if the Minister determines there is a substantial risk that the brokering or export of the goods or technology would result in any of the negative consequences described above (emphasis in application). 

 

Other domestic instruments to this judicial review proceedings include Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which protects the interests of “life, liberty, and security of the person”, the Geneva Conventions Act 1985 (which domesticates the Geneva Conventions), and the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act.

 

International instruments cited in the complaint include the Genocide Convention, the Rome Statute, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

This claim has been brought by Canadian Lawyers for International Human Rights (CLAIHR) and Al-Haq, as well as by three Palestinian-Canadians and one Palestinian national currently seeking asylum in Canada. CHLAIHR is also the legal representative in this case.

To get in touch with the claimants and their legal representatives, please see here.

Themes

i

A letter was sent to the Minister of Foreign Affairs on 28 January 2024 urgently requesting information on Canada’s export approvals of military goods or technology to or destined for Israel. The Minister did not respond to the letter.

Publicly, the Respondents maintained that they did not issue any export approvals for “full weapon systems” since 9 October 2023, but Access to Information requests revealed that between 9 October and early December 2023, Canada approved an additional 28.5 million CAD in exports of military goods and technology to Israel.  

Read more about the issue of transparency in other jurisdictions

In the case relating to arms transfers to Saudi Arabia, the Applicant was able to bring a case against the government based on domestic law, but was denied standing to raise the argument of a violation of Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions before Canadian administrative courts.  

In this case, the matter has not yet arisen in proceedings.

Read more about standing across all cases

The EIPA has incorporated much of the ATT into Canada’s domestic law. The relevant provisions’ references to international humanitarian and human rights law requires pleadings relying on relevant treaties and customary law. International legal instruments are also used as interpretative mechanisms in Canadian courts. The application also relies on the Genocide Convention and the International Court of Justice’s decision thereon.  

Read more about the applicability of international and legal instruments across the challenges

The matter has not yet arisen in proceedings. 

Read more about the issue of justiciability in other jurisdictions

The application centres on the needs of Palestinian victims and is brought on behalf of Palestinian victims and their family members in Canada. The application asks for a Court declaration that the provision of military goods or technology to Israel on or after 9 October 2023 is in breach of the EIPA, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada’s obligations under the Geneva Conventions Act, Canada’s international treaty obligations, and Canada’s legal obligations under customary international law, as well as unlawful given the ‘serious risk’ of inter alia breaches of IHL and IHRL. The application also asks that all such permits for licences be suspended (including permits to be issued, past permits issued or past permits still in effect on or after 9 October 2023), any permits currently under consideration be denied, and Israel be removed from the Automatic Firearms Country Control List (a list of established countries considered appropriate to export any restricted firearms, weapons, or devices and their related components). 

The matter has not yet arisen in proceedings.

Read more about whether claimants have been granted remedy in other jurisdictions

Cases

Case status

Ongoing

Application for Judicial Review against the Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs

Explore case

This case seeks a judicial review in respect of the issuance of export and brokering permits (export approvals) for arms, ammunition, implements or munitions of war (military goods or technology) to Israel, authorised by the Minister of Foreign Affairs on or after 9 October 2023, in the context of the situation in Palestine, particularly in Gaza. As of April 2024, the case is in its early stages and the next steps remain unclear.

Key Case Documents

View all case documents

05.03.2024

Notice of Application for Judicial Review

Read in full

Timeline

FILTERS

05 Mar 2024

Challenge 1

Application for judicial review submitted.

Read full application here

28 Jan 2024

Challenge 1

A coalition of individuals and civil society organisations sent a letter to the Minister of Foreign Affairs urgently requesting information on Canada’s export approvals of military goods or technology to or destined for Israel and that any permits issued after 7 October 2023 be cancelled. The Minister did not respond to the letter.

Read the full letter here

Analysis

02 February 2024

Nicaragua calls on UK, Germany, the Netherlands and Canada to immediately halt the supply of arms, ammunition, technology and/or components to Israel

Kawsachun News

Nicaragua calls on UK, Germany, the Netherlands and Canada to immediately halt the supply of arms, ammunition, technology and/or components to Israel as they may have been used to facilitate or commit acts of genocide in Gaza.

28 January 2024

Letter to the Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs on Canadian military goods and technology transfers to Israel since 7 October 2023

On 28 January 2024, a coalition of Canadians and Palestinians wrote to Minister of Foreign Affairs Mélanie Joly demanding that the federal government immediately halt all exports and transfers of Canadian military goods and technology to Israel.

Contact & More Information

If you would like to know more about this case, please get in touch with our primary contact Henry Off (CLAIHR) by email

Find out more about the work of the Applicants at their websites: 

Canadian Lawyers for International Human Rights (CLAIHR)

Al-Haq