Home > Case Overviews > Italian Arms and Yemen
Italian Arms and Yemen
Jurisdiction
Italy
Locale
Armed Conflict in Yemen
Recipient State
Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates
Status
Closed
Legal challenges in Italy against arms transfers in the context of the Yemen war have taken a somewhat different approach to other jurisdictions as the claimants have sought to hold licensing officials, as well as the corporate managers of an arms manufacturer, criminally liable for arms exports to coalition states involved in the war in Yemen.
The fact that this complaint addresses the criminal liability of public officials is quite unique and goes beyond judicial efforts that seek to establish liability for violations of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) or EU Common Position that have been initiated in other national jurisdictions. Specifically, the claimant NGOs have called for the criminal prosecution of individuals responsible for activity that allegedly led to the use of Italian manufactured military components in an airstrike perpetrated by Coalition members in Yemen that resulted in civilian deaths.
On 10 March 2023, the Judge for Preliminary Investigations in Rome dismissed the case concerning the criminal responsibility of the defendants, despite confirming that Italy’s National Authority for the Export of Armament (UAMA) was “in violation of at least Articles 6 and 7 of the [ATT]” by issuing export licences to RWM Italia S.p.A. The judge did not consider the suspects prosecutable, as it could not be proven that the main intent of the directors of UAMA was to procure a pecuniary advantage to RWM Italia S.p.A.
Watch full webinar here (27 June 2023)
Latest developments
Case Analysis
Proceedings in Italy are complex in nature and address detailed issues of criminal law, including the criminal responsibility of corporate executives and public officials, rather than specifically addressing the administrative legality of licensing decisions under the ATT or EU Common Position, as has been the approach of other domestic litigation documented on this site. As such, investigations concentrated on the offence of the abuse of office. However, on 10 March, 2023, the Judge for Preliminary Investigations in Rome dismissed the case, as it could not be proven that UAMA officials had the intent to procure a pecuniary advantage to the company.
Themes
iCases
Case status
This request called for an criminal investigation into government officials who had granted licences for the export of arms to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, and corporate executives of an arms manufacturer for physical damage and civilian deaths caused by the use of their products in Yemen. On 10 March 2023, the prosecutor ordered the proceedings to be definitively closed.
Timeline
FILTERS
10 Mar 2023
Judge for Preliminary Investigations rules that that it could not be proven that the main intent of the directors of UAMA was to cause unfair damage to the victims or to procure a pecuniary advantage for RWM Italia S.p.A.
Read preliminary analysis of judgement here15 Mar 2022
The NGO complainants appeal the decision of the Prosecutor to the GIP. The appeal argues that there is sufficient evidence in the case to move directly to trial. A hearing on this second dismissal is pending.
07 Dec 2021
The prosecutor requests the dismissal of the case again, on the same legal grounds that led him to the dismissal in September 2018, and which had already been overruled by the GIP.
22 Feb 2021
GIP orders for the investigation to be continued and orders the Prosecutor to request additional information from the Italian authorities and the RWM Italia.
22 Oct 2018
Dismissal appealed to the Judge of Preliminary Investigations. The claimants argue that the Prosecutor has failed to consider murder and personal injury charges as well as the criminal liability of the corporate executives, and failed to properly review the lawfulness of the licensing procedure.
18 Sep 2018
Case dismissed by the Prosecutor. Prosecutor concludes that no characterisation of mens rea is required for the abuse of power of UAMA, and there are no serious factual and legal grounds for proceedings.
17 Apr 2018
Case enters the courts. Complaint filed to the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Rome, requesting the investigation of corporate executives of RWM Italia and senior officials from UAMA regarding their alleged individual criminal liability for the role their exports allegedly played in the airstrike and subsequent civilian harm.
09 Oct 2016
Yemeni NGO Mwatana for Human Rights explore the remnants of the bomb used in the airstrike and find a suspension lug (a device used to attach the bomb to its aircraft) that had been produced by RWM Italia.
08 Oct 2016
An airstrike in Deir Al-Hajari, Yemen results in the death of six civilians including four children and a pregnant women.
Contact & More Information
If you would like to know more about this case, please get in touch with our primary contact Laura Duarte-Reyes (ECCHR) by email.
You can find out more about the work of the claimants at their website:
Key
There has been a recent improvement in this thematic area
There has been a recent worsening of this thematic area
Analysis
01 April 2018
European Responsibility for War Crimes in Yemen – Complicity of RWM Italia and Italian Arms Export Authority?European Centre for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR)
This case report from one of the claimants provides a detailed and comprehensive overview and analysis of the Italian legal challenge.
Read more27 June 2023
The Arms Trade Litigation Monitor: Legal Actions Against Irresponsible Arms TradeFrancesco Vignarca | Rete Italiana Pace e Disarmo
Francesco Vignarca discusses the criminal investigation into the liability of UAMA officials and RWM Italia S.p.A for arms exports to Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Read more15 March 2023
Italy fails victims of war crimes in Yemen despite proof of violation of Arms Trade TreatyRete Italiana Pace e Disarmo
Rete Italiana Pace e Disarmo published an article on the decision of the Judge for Preliminary Investigations in Rome concerning the criminal responsibility of Italian public officials and the CEO of an arms manufacturer for exporting arms that were used in Yemen.
Read more28 June 2019
Legal challenges to EU member states’ arms exports to Saudi Arabia: Current status and potential implicationsGiovanna Maletta | SIPRI
This article provides a detailed overview of legal challenges against arms exports to Saudi Arabia, with a particular focus on the Italian and UK context.
Read more